Show and Tell Post: Fur

Fur

by Migdalia Cruz

            Migdalia Cruz is a playwright, screenwriter, and play translator.  She has written over forty plays.  Fur was first produced in the 1990’s.  I found this play on the North American Women’s Drama Database.

            Fur is about three people:  Citrona, Nena, and Michael.  It is a twisted love story between a pet owner (Michael), his beautiful animal trapper (Nena), and the woman he bought (Citrona).  There is a love triangle:  Michael loves Citrona, Citrona loves Nena, and Nena loves Michael.  Throughout the plot, the reader discovers new things about each character’s past and how they are all different from each other.  Towards the end of the play, the reader understands that the characters are all different, but they still all want the same thing:  love.  The play occurs under Joe’s Pet Shop in the desert of California, which is now under Michael’s care.  He buys Citrona from a carnival sideshow, and then hires Nena to trap animals to feed Citrona.  The story is pulsing with lust as each character waits to be with another character.  The play revolves around these eccentric characters and their feelings toward each other.

            The dramaturgical choice to keep Citrona in a cage the whole time is one that stuck out to me.  She is kept in a cage even though she is not an animal; she is just a furry woman.  Her entrapment in the cage reflects the entrapment of each character.  Each character is trapped in their own lust and agony.  The cage is a physical manifestation of the things that are holding them in.  Each character is consumed in lust, which keeps them from realizing that who they love will never love them.  The cage constantly being on stage creates a tension.  It is a metaphor showing that the bars are actually bars between each characters’ relationship with another.  They will never be able to escape to be with who they want to be with.     

            The second dramaturgical choice that stuck out to me was that the stage is slowly filling up with sand.  This choice is interesting to me because I have never read a play that did something like this, especially something that seems so challenging for production.  The stage filling with sand is supposed to show time throughout the play. As the play goes on, it gets harder and harder for the characters to move about the stage.  They are not trudging through mud, but it is a hassle to walk through.  The sand can symbolize the interference of the other characters in the others’ relationships, meaning:  Citrona stands in the way of Nena and Michael, Michael stands in the way of Nena and Citrona, and Nena stands in the way of Michael and Citrona.

            Cruz makes interesting choices.  My favorite part of her choices is that they connect to the production choices.  Her decision to include the cage and the sand also gives creative license to the production team.  These choices can bring about innovative ways to include a cage and the element of sand.  I am extremely curious to see what a staged production of this would turn out to look like.  Her choices not only allow for interesting production choices, but also for emphasis on aspects of the characters’ relationships.          

Cruz, Migdalia. Fur. Electronic Edition by Alexander Street Press, L.L.C., 2013. Web. 5 Nov. 2013.